Fratto Farms

Stated that while the plan has improved, neighbors prefer the current zoning remain in place and oppose rezoning solely for developer profit.

Voiced concern that changing zoning sets a precedent for the neighborhood and asked that the project be handled via a development agreement without altering base zoning.

Shared concerns about mountain views being blocked, building height, and drone measurements of the property.

Noted that his two-story house is only 22 feet tall, questioned 35-foot height limits, and suggested an 8-home limit would be preferable.

Expressed worry over traffic, parking, spot zoning, and the height of the proposed homes after living in the area for over 50 years.

Stated that high-density development goes against what residents were told when moving to Draper and urged the council not to approve tall towers.

Expressed privacy concerns from two-story homes overlooking her bedrooms and complained about heavy traffic and speeding on 800 East.

Lives in a historic 1909 home on the street and emphasized preserving the semi-rural character rather than modernizing everything.

Noted that while farm uses would be great, commercial development in the middle of a neighborhood is inappropriate.

Asked the commission to look at planning from a broader perspective rather than piecemeal rezoning, and to wait for the ongoing train station area study.

Expressed opposition, noting that commercial areas belong on arterial roads rather than encroaching into established neighborhoods.

Stated that residents own their homes and want the zoning left alone, opposing commercial or high-density residential development.

A 46-year resident who complained about heavy traffic and dangerous intersections, stating the project is not conducive to the neighborhood.

Shared how peaceful and quiet the street is for walkers and wildlife, opposing high-density or commercial changes.

Stated that the applicant bought the property knowing the zoning and asked the commission to deny the application to protect the residential area.

Questioned why zoning changes should be considered when the property could profitably accommodate single-family homes under current rules.

Opposed to 24 units; suggested lower density would be acceptable.

Opposed to high-density development in the area.

Opposed to high-density housing; noted the area is rural and lacks infrastructure.

Asked the Commission to deny the application.

Opposed to high density; noted the street has already seen significant growth.