Bangerter Crossroads Development Agreement Request

Requested an 8-foot wall and additional screening trees along the detention pond backing up to his property.

Detailed massive violations of lighting ordinances, severe traffic generation, and incompatible placement of service areas facing residential homes.

Argued the project is incompatible with the area, shifts traffic burdens onto 300 East, and falls short on buffer and tree requirements.

Requested an 8-foot wall, a HAWK pedestrian crossing signal on 300 East for school children, and adjustments to temporary access lighting.

Expressed concern over noise projection from the loading bay facing his residential property and requested removal of parking rows to widen landscape buffers.

Noted a property line overlap, requested a condition of approval to resolve it, and argued the north landscape buffer is inadequate under DCMC section 9-23-110.

Asserted the traffic study is flawed because it assumes general retail instead of drive-thrus, projecting 16,000 daily trips instead of 9,000, and requested an independent peer review.

Stated lighting is excessively bright, questioned tree sizes and detention basin planting restrictions, and urged stricter tenant use prohibitions.

Asked whether approval will be conditioned on a 300 East traffic signal, questioned monument sign heights and plant size reductions, and raised truck routing and amenity concerns.

Expressed concern that delivery truck backing up, trash, and shopping carts behind Smith's will face residential homes and increase neighborhood cut-through traffic.

Noted his property on 13800 South experiences severe traffic accidents and road rage, questioned ingress/egress viability, and criticized postponing the traffic signal to phase two.

Highlighted severe existing traffic delays and headlight glare affecting her home, expressing fear for children crossing the street near bus stops.

Praised resident research, emphasized that three sides of the project abut residential neighborhoods, and urged the commission to protect existing homeowners from overdevelopment.

Suggested it is far easier to decline approval than to forward a conditional recommendation with dozens of required changes.

Stated turning left onto 300 East is already very difficult and dangerous, highlighting major safety issues at local pedestrian crosswalks.

Encouraged the traffic study to account for constrained neighborhood exit routes that force residents to navigate roundabouts and parks to return home.

Noted 300 East is increasingly used as an I-15 overflow artery during crashes, worsening local congestion.