Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 6
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jun 12, 2025.
Public comments (9)
Requested that regional trail access be maintained during the construction of the Alpine Hollow development and bridge.
Planning Commission - Jun 12, 2025 · 1:03:18 →Expressed the need to accommodate equestrian use and trail connectivity in the Alpine Hollow project area.
Planning Commission - Jun 12, 2025 · 1:05:53 →Expressed concern about road impacts, springs, and potential slides in the Mercer Hollow wetland area.
Planning Commission - Jun 12, 2025 · 1:07:49 →Questioned the necessity of such a long access road through open space and asked about erosion and lighting impacts.
Planning Commission - Jun 12, 2025 · 1:09:22 →Commended the lower density but urged pausing the decision to address trail access, stormwater, geotech, wildlife, and wildfire plans.
Planning Commission - Jun 12, 2025 · 1:11:30 →Spoke for Save Our Trails, asking to delay the decision due to concerns over ADU density increases, fire marshal findings, and emergency egress.
Planning Commission - Jun 12, 2025 · 1:14:43 →Supported the reduced density alternative but noted potential conflicts with a high-speed gas line traversing the property.
Planning Commission - Jun 12, 2025 · 1:18:30 →Expressed opposition on behalf of Mercer Retreat neighbors regarding the single access road exceeding code limits for 30 homes.
Planning Commission - Jun 12, 2025 · 1:19:24 →Noted that the project entrance is currently used as a de facto trailhead and urged parking and trail access preservation.
Planning Commission - Jun 12, 2025 · 1:21:34 →